<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>toniBlog &#187; build automation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the-arm.com/tag/build-automation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the-arm.com</link>
	<description>A weblog about Methodologies for Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 07:22:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Reviving JRake</title>
		<link>http://www.the-arm.com/2008/09/reviving-jrake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-arm.com/2008/09/reviving-jrake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>toni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[build automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[j-rake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jrake]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-arm.com/?p=286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The post about the need of a new build tool had many comments and reactions so I started, before coding something brand new, to search on the web for something to solve the current, well known build  tools problems. 
I found out that Gant is pretty cool but then I started to search for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post about <a href="http://www.the-arm.com/2008/09/its-time-to-write-a-better-build-tool/">the need of a new build tool</a> had many comments and reactions so I started, before coding something brand new, to search on the web for something to solve the current, well known build  tools problems. </p>
<p>I found out that <a href="http://gant.codehaus.org/">Gant</a> is pretty cool but then I started to search for something using ruby, rake and java&#8230; </p>
<p>And I found that back in 2006 <a href="http://www.martinfowler.com/bliki/JRake.html">Martin Fowler</a> and <a href="http://blog.foemmel.com/search?q=jrake">Mattew Foemmel</a> were already talking and working on this&#8230; </p>
<p>So I&#8217;ve sent an email to Mattew since his svn repository wasn&#8217;t neither working, I&#8217;ve got the code of his jrake and I&#8217;ve started <a href="http://code.google.com/p/j-rake/">a project on Google code</a>, the name, unfortunately is j-rake (another jrake project was already there). </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just did the first check in, compacting the vendor folder on all the scripts. J-Rake in fact comes out with jruby, rake and all the libraries you need to compile and test your code. </p>
<p>The next small step will be to upgrade all the libraries to the latest version, then some more clean up and then writing more examples on how to write J-Rake tasks. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve a very bad rake/ruby knowledge so any help/suggestion is more than welcome. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-arm.com/2008/09/reviving-jrake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s time to write a better build tool</title>
		<link>http://www.the-arm.com/2008/09/its-time-to-write-a-better-build-tool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-arm.com/2008/09/its-time-to-write-a-better-build-tool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>toni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TWBlog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alt.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[build automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-arm.com/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve heard more than one time in the last months, half of my friends complain about maven, the other half is just almost happy with ant. The rubists are generally happy with rake, the biggest problems are on the java/.net world. 
So I thought about branching ant and rewriting it in a slightly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve heard more than one time in the last months, half of my friends complain about maven, the other half is just <em>almost</em> happy with ant. The rubists are <em>generally</em> happy with rake, the biggest problems are on the java/.net world. </p>
<p>So I thought about branching ant and rewriting it in a slightly different way, using yaml instead of xml and having always only one option for any task parameter. I always hated and found difficult to remember how to do things in ant since there are always two or more good alternatives (like why there&#8217;s a dir and a file parameter option in the delete command? Isn&#8217;t a directory a file?). </p>
<p>So, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll be able to allocate a lot of time to this, but I would love to hear something from you, ideas and comments. </p>
<p>In the last weeks I&#8217;ve started to write a shared mind map with <a href="http://rekursiv.se/">Staffan Nöteberg</a> on micro time boxing&#8230; Maybe we can do the same with this topic. </p>
<p>Ping me if you&#8217;re interested. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-arm.com/2008/09/its-time-to-write-a-better-build-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
