Comments on: don’t call them phones, the g-phone and i-phone battle http://www.the-arm.com/2008/02/dont-call-them-phones-the-g-phone-and-i-phone-battle/ A weblog about Methodologies for Development Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:49:20 +0000 hourly 1 By: j2me software http://www.the-arm.com/2008/02/dont-call-them-phones-the-g-phone-and-i-phone-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-7296 j2me software Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:53:57 +0000 http://blog.java2me.org/2008/02/11/dont-call-them-phones-the-g-phone-and-i-phone-battle/#comment-7296 I think that Android is going to be not much popular rather like Symbian or BlackBerry. I think that Android is going to be not much popular rather like Symbian or BlackBerry.

]]> By: Fabrizio Giudici http://www.the-arm.com/2008/02/dont-call-them-phones-the-g-phone-and-i-phone-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-7151 Fabrizio Giudici Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:59:41 +0000 http://blog.java2me.org/2008/02/11/dont-call-them-phones-the-g-phone-and-i-phone-battle/#comment-7151 Hmm... I have to be picky :-) Android is not based on Java, but on Dalvik, which just happens to be a VM compatible with Java. And AFAIK (but I reckon there's a mess of information around), Dalvik itself is _not_ open sourced: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/21/dalvik/comments/ I'm frustrated to with J2ME, but I'm also very suspicious on Android... Hmm… I have to be picky :-) Android is not based on Java, but on Dalvik, which just happens to be a VM compatible with Java. And AFAIK (but I reckon there’s a mess of information around), Dalvik itself is _not_ open sourced: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/21/dalvik/comments/

I’m frustrated to with J2ME, but I’m also very suspicious on Android…

]]>